Do you know why the systemic approaches are best for quantitative literature review? If not, then it is not a science at all. A systemic approach is useful for literature review because it has the least chances of biasedness, with ensuring credibility. It can help during MPhil thesis writing help and is also useful in conducting quantitative research. It can provide a comprehensive summary of the literature.
But, how to do that?
Starting the research on an unfamiliar topic is not an easy task. Some research topics can give you a tough time. During your research, you have to go through plenty of research done by previous researchers. Sometimes, it can be not very reassuring, but easier and more structured approaches for conducting literature reviews are popping out these days.
Knowing the difference between qualitative and quantitative research
Before going deep into the quantitative literature review, first, for this you have been get into the PhD Thesis Writing Services in US because it is important to know the difference between the qualitative and the quantitative literature review. In qualitative research, usually, the literature that contains the variables based on language is reviewed. A quantitative literature review involves the literature that contains the variables based on numerical figures.
What are the steps you must know about the systemic quantitative literature review?
Many short steps are involved in the quantitative literature review. Let us have a look at all of these steps to develop a good understanding and familiarity.
- What are your objectives? Define them briefly.
- Which methodology is going to be the best fit for your literature review?
- I am choosing the relevant literature.
- Credibility and the effectiveness of the chosen literature.
- Give a read to every chosen literature and make notes.
- Give it an end by writing its comprehensive summary.
Want to know the benefits?
A systemic quantitative literature review is different from a traditional narrative approach, and its benefits are given as follows.
The review is quantitative, and it will help to analyze where the research is done properly and where are the research gaps. It quantifies both the research and the research gaps.
This review also assesses which previous researchers used subjects, responses, and variables during their research. What are the findings of the previous researchers? A new researcher can conclude a comprehensive summary by using a systemic review.
A systemic quantitative literature review is best for the social sciences and also for the natural ones. This reviewing literature is very effective in highlighting the variables and the subjects for future research.
Why Choose systemic quantitative literature review?
You must choose a systemic quantitative literature review as it helps in summarizing the diverse topics and give future recommendations. It is an effective and smart way to review the literature efficiently. It is the best reviewing method for the research students. It involves clear rules for the inclusion and exclusion of the literature.
The first step in literature reviewing is to select the literature from the database. You can search from the database and identify your target literature to review, or you can add new records from other sources. In case the records are duplicated, then You will remove the duplicate records from the database.
Records screening is an important step in the systemic quantitative literature review. It can help avoid duplicate literature, select the best literature, and then exclude the one that is of no use and not beneficial for your research. Initial screening is something compulsory in the systemic quantitative literature review.
Eligibility is the third step in the systemic approach. In this step, the full-text articles will be assessed for eligibility, and You will exclude the excluded ones for reasons.
You will review the included literature by using a systemic quantitative literature review.
Being systemic and quantitative
Systemic means to survey the literature, select the most productive ones by screening and inclusion and exclude unnecessary and duplicated ones with reasons. On the other hand, quantitative involves how many research papers or literature is needed to be reviewed for the specific section of different topics. The structure of the document is usually standard in the systemic quantitative literature review.
How can this method help students during their research?
A larger number of students pass out each year after completing their research on various topics during their masters and Ph.D. Most universities advise the students to publish their research during their academic career as it benefits the researcher, the supervisor, and the university. But the question arises is that what method the university students should adopt during their publications? The answer to the question is the same as discussed above.
But why to use systematic literature?
The systemic quantitative literature review method is the best method for reviewing the published literature. This method allows them to do the initial screening and include the best literature, and exclude the duplicated and additional literature with reasons. This method is more beneficial, effective, and systemic than the traditional narrative method. This method is also used to identify literature gaps and to predict future researches on certain topics. This method can also be used as the first basic step for future analysis.
Characteristics of a Systemic Quantitative Literature Review
A systemic quantitative literature review is different from all other traditional methods. Its characteristics are given as following.
Systemic reviews are very systemic, to the point, and without any biasedness. The transparent ones mean that they are properly documented, and there is no confusion in the decisions.
The systemic quantitative literature review seems to be much clear than other traditional methods of reviewing the literature. It involves the process of inclusion and exclusion along with initial screening.
Systemic review is further divided into many other subcategories. However, the type of systemic review that is used in quantitative literature review is a meta-analysis. You can use this technique of meta-analysis to make new frameworks and new findings of the research topic. Meta-analysis can be conducted as an individual method or as a part of the systemic review. It is used to combine the findings from different quantitative researches.
The main characteristic of the systemic quantitative literature review is that it focuses on summarizing the existing literature and resynthesizing previous researchers’ ideas and arguments. Usually, it does not involve the addition of new contributions to the research findings.
Systemic quantitative literature reviews are generally used to synthesize existing research by giving conclusions based on the quality of the literature. Using this method, you can also give your recommendations for further analysis and point out the literature gaps.